Skip to content
Old Roblox Simulation screenshot

Old Roblox Simulation

By: Carcat62

Maturity: Unrated

game

Playing now
0
Record
—
Visits
89+
Play on Roblox
51

Record: 0 players

Player count

The filled area is the average of each interval, the dashed line the highest value in it.

Hourly new visits

Visits added to the game's total.

Hourly new favorites

People who added the game to their favorites.

Like ratio

Likes as a share of all likes and dislikes.

This game is measured once a day · last measured 7 days ago · tracked since Oct 3, 2026

About Old Roblox Simulation

Old Roblox Simulation is a Roblox game made by Carcat62. 0 people are playing it right now; it has 89 visits in total and 2 people have favorited it. 83% of players like it (5 likes, 1 dislikes). It was created on Mar 27, 2022 and last updated on Apr 30, 2022.

Frequently asked

How many people are playing Old Roblox Simulation right now?
Old Roblox Simulation is being played by 0 people right now. We measure popular games every minute.
How many visits does Old Roblox Simulation have?
Old Roblox Simulation has been visited 89 times in total.
Who made Old Roblox Simulation?
Old Roblox Simulation was made by the Roblox developer Carcat62.
When did Old Roblox Simulation come out?
Old Roblox Simulation was created on Mar 27, 2022 and last updated on Apr 30, 2022.

Carcat62's Games

Sign In to RBLXSTAT

Your favorites, followed games and notifications are waiting.

No account? Sign Up

This isn't your Roblox account: you sign in to RBLXSTAT with a separate account. Never type your Roblox password here.

Sign Up

Create a free account and follow the games you love

This becomes your profile address: rblxstat.com/users/username

You can sign in with your email too; it's never shown to others.

At least 8 characters. Don't reuse a password from another site.

Already have an account? Sign In

Reset your password

Enter the email address of your account and we'll send you a link to choose a new password.

Can't reach that inbox, or is something else wrong? Write to us: [email protected]

Back to sign in